Why has the number of models gone down?
log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Science : Why has the number of models gone down?

Author Message
Qax
Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 12
Posts: 6
Credit: 3,889,080
RAC: 0
Message 2121 - Posted: 28 Nov 2013, 10:02:43 UTC

A few days ago there were over 800, and now there's 600 and some. I've been doing this project for awhile now, and it doesn't really seem like we're making progress.

I think it's one of the most important projects I do, and I realize the user base isn't as large as many of the other projects ~ However.....the # of models and asteroids modeled......seems to go up and down, and at the end of the day it seems like a lot of the work we do might be junked? My WUs aren't showing up invalid, but.....I know how many asteroids are out there, and with the progress that we've been making we might be off earth by the time we get 90% of them figured out.

Profile Kyong
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 12
Posts: 570
Credit: 52,629,744
RAC: 0
Message 2123 - Posted: 28 Nov 2013, 16:44:53 UTC
Last modified: 28 Nov 2013, 16:51:30 UTC

Well, I do not understand much what do you mean. There is still the same number of models in Scientific Results section. We are also processing many data but results are valid because the computation was right, but the "result" of the result doesn't have to be right. Data is usually very noisy because of high magnitude so there is low success of finding the right period, but without processing all data we can't know, what part and where is data for finding the right period, if any.

Qax
Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 12
Posts: 6
Credit: 3,889,080
RAC: 0
Message 2133 - Posted: 28 Nov 2013, 20:01:07 UTC - in response to Message 2123.

Oh. I guess I was looking more at DAMIT, instead of the material you guys specifically published. My bad.

[TA]Assimilator1
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 24 Aug 13
Posts: 107
Credit: 28,948,560
RAC: 24,832
Message 2987 - Posted: 7 May 2014, 17:50:26 UTC - in response to Message 2123.

Well, I do not understand much what do you mean. There is still the same number of models in Scientific Results section. We are also processing many data but results are valid because the computation was right, but the "result" of the result doesn't have to be right. Data is usually very noisy because of high magnitude so there is low success of finding the right period, but without processing all data we can't know, what part and where is data for finding the right period, if any.

Interesting, roughly what % of data do you think yields results?
____________
Team AnandTech - SETI@H, Muon1 DPAD, Folding@H, MilkyWay@H, Asteroids@H, LHC@H, POGS, Rosetta@H, Einstein@H.

Main rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16GB DDR3 1866, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - Q9550 @3.6 GHz, 8GB DDR2 1066, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), Win 7

Josef Durech
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 18 Jun 12
Posts: 26
Credit: 4,871,367
RAC: 2,410
Message 3043 - Posted: 16 May 2014, 12:24:35 UTC - in response to Message 2987.

About 1 %.

[TA]Assimilator1
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 24 Aug 13
Posts: 107
Credit: 28,948,560
RAC: 24,832
Message 3046 - Posted: 16 May 2014, 18:02:46 UTC - in response to Message 3043.

Wow! No wonder the table is a slow grower ;)
Btw it would be interesting to know on that table how many results their are.
____________
Team AnandTech - SETI@H, Muon1 DPAD, Folding@H, MilkyWay@H, Asteroids@H, LHC@H, POGS, Rosetta@H, Einstein@H.

Main rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16GB DDR3 1866, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - Q9550 @3.6 GHz, 8GB DDR2 1066, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), Win 7


Post to thread

Message boards : Science : Why has the number of models gone down?


Main page · Your account · Message boards


Copyright © 2019 Asteroids@home