Posts by Falconet
1)
(Message 7047)
Posted 7 Sep 2020 by Falconet Post: You were 42 when I checked it yesterday! |
2)
(Message 7041)
Posted 6 Sep 2020 by Falconet Post: Like this? http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/top_users.php You are ranked 42 by recent average credit! |
3)
(Message 7039)
Posted 5 Sep 2020 by Falconet Post: Hope you get what you need. Good luck. |
4)
(Message 7029)
Posted 19 Aug 2020 by Falconet Post: The Hubble Asteroid Hunter project has finished. But the Catalina Outer Solar System Survey Project has launched just a week ago, hoping to find new Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs) https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/fulsdavid/catalina-outer-solar-system-survey |
5)
(Message 6213)
Posted 16 Mar 2019 by Falconet Post: Any updates? |
6)
(Message 3607)
Posted 17 Sep 2014 by Falconet Post: Any news about the OpenCL app? |
7)
(Message 3243)
Posted 18 Jun 2014 by Falconet Post: what withrow money. not found withrow option What? This isn't about money. You can't make any money with distributed computing volunteering projects. |
8)
(Message 3169)
Posted 7 Jun 2014 by Falconet Post: Any news on making the app official? |
9)
(Message 3131)
Posted 31 May 2014 by Falconet Post: During the last week I made another benchmark, this time under a more realistic setting: Nice, hope the project's admins test and make the app official. |
10)
(Message 3053)
Posted 18 May 2014 by Falconet Post: http://www.boincunited.org/period_search_10210_windows_x86_64_bd_fma4_gcc.zip Copy that and past in the address bar. |
11)
(Message 3021)
Posted 11 May 2014 by Falconet Post: Not bad. Your tasks are running a little faster than the i7's. I see. By the way, the app is checkpointing with me. |
12)
(Message 3016)
Posted 11 May 2014 by Falconet Post: Not bad. Your tasks are running a little faster than the i7's. |
13)
(Message 3014)
Posted 11 May 2014 by Falconet Post: First fma4 wu validated. That is strange. I am fairly sure that mine checkpointed... |
14)
(Message 3009)
Posted 10 May 2014 by Falconet Post: I am not sure. It may reduce the gap between AMD and Intel but more testing is required. Indeed it would. |
15)
(Message 3004)
Posted 9 May 2014 by Falconet Post: I am not sure. It may reduce the gap between AMD and Intel but more testing is required. |
16)
(Message 3000)
Posted 9 May 2014 by Falconet Post: It is for Windows. I only have one A8-6500. I have a link but I don't want give it without the author's permission. An app_info file is already included and configured (only needs to be placed in the project's folder). |
17)
(Message 2998)
Posted 9 May 2014 by Falconet Post: I have tested the app but only ran 4 tasks with it. http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/results.php?hostid=13438&offset=0&show_names=0&state=4&appid= Against an i7-4770, my A8-6500 3.5GHZ took 10,996.37 CPU time vs 9,167.34 CPU time on the i7. Against an i7-3770, mine took 9,752.09 CPU time vs 7,808.02 CPU time on the i7. Against an i5-4570, mine took 10,705.40 CPU time vs 7,551.07 CPU time on the i5. The other task was ran against a GPU. So, they take longer but the i7's and i5 have much larger Floating Point and Integer figures than mine. I don't even know what clock they are running. My A8-6500: Measured floating point speed 1523.05 million ops/sec Measured integer speed 6243.76 million ops/sec i5-4570: Measured floating point speed 3496.34 million ops/sec Measured integer speed 14860.04 million ops/sec i7-3770: Measured floating point speed 3688.48 million ops/sec Measured integer speed 13060.77 million ops/sec i7-4770: Measured floating point speed 3563.17 million ops/sec Measured integer speed 14800.09 million ops/sec I think this needs more testing. Hope the project scientists are interested in testing this. |
18)
(Message 2924)
Posted 21 Apr 2014 by Falconet Post: Have you tested the app any further? |