Posts by Andrew Davis
|
1)
(Message 2892)
Posted 28 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: 3/28/2014 5:14:55 AM | Asteroids@home | Server error: feeder not running |
|
2)
(Message 2845)
Posted 20 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: 3/19/2014 10:51:04 PM | Asteroids@home | Giving up on download of input_20770_25: permanent HTTP error uh-oh! |
|
3)
(Message 2768)
Posted 15 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: Approximately 1/3 of all of my validation tasks were timed out by my wing men. The vast majority of them being Mr. Kinney and Mr. Broiles. No biggie..... |
|
4)
(Message 2767)
Posted 15 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: No problem. The server is back up, so I'll give it another try..... POGS is working really well.... |
|
5)
(Message 2757)
Posted 15 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: They're on the same team too... http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/team_members.php?teamid=2022&offset=0&sort_by=expavg_credit |
|
6)
(Message 2756)
Posted 15 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: If this was a witch-hunt, I'd probably point my finger at Dagorath. He has already expressed some admiration for the "scheme" which he believes is "doable" because he has done it before! LOL Let's all just get along.... |
|
7)
(Message 2755)
Posted 15 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: Hey guys! Like all of you, I've "donated" my computer, time and resources to science. I am not a whore or a pirate. I'm not in this for any type of self-gratification. This is not the 17th century and I wouldn't have believed in witch-hunts then. I thought there was a problem and I am a newbie to boinc, I'll admit that. *SHAKES HANDS ALL AROUND* |
|
8)
(Message 2753)
Posted 15 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: Jamie Kinney CPU type GenuineIntel Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz [Family 6 Model 62 Stepping 4] Number of processors 32 Dave Broiles CPU type GenuineIntel Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz [Family 6 Model 62 Stepping 4] Number of processors 32 seem to be confederates...... |
|
9)
(Message 2752)
Posted 15 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: hmmmmmm Message boards : Cafe : I feel good comment 1 (banished: ID 49533) 41 23 days ago I did a search for Jamie Kinney on all of the forums, and the above also came up.... |
|
10)
(Message 2751)
Posted 15 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: If it is a deceit, he's probably running under so many pseudonyms that we'll never be able to track down THE individual, or it could be a team as you've implied..... They would never publicly respond |
|
11)
(Message 2750)
Posted 15 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: Possible it was deceit. But, everyone in that challenge has effectively been screwed because the server went down. I don't know all the details, but I would think that grabbing up and controlling all of the w.u.'s possibly helped shut everything down..... |
|
12)
(Message 2749)
Posted 15 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: I don't know who to P.M. Thanks for volunteering me though. LOL |
|
13)
Posted 14 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/index.php "server status" |
|
14)
(Message 2739)
Posted 14 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: Aww come on now. We don't hold it against you that you talk like a whore. We know the mind controlling boogeyman computer holding your credits ransom made you talk that way. I fail to understand how the other users skill, facts and piracy, had anything to do with the problems now existing at A@H? |
|
15)
(Message 2723)
Posted 13 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: So, I'm being compared to a whore and a pirate. Good bye and good luck gentlemen. |
|
16)
(Message 2721)
Posted 13 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: Fine. I guess you'd have no problem finding 100 volunteers with unlimited access to machinery and power. Good luck.... |
|
17)
(Message 2719)
Posted 13 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: Apparently, these large users have the resources to attach several machines to this project. Unfortunately, these large "new" users have effectively placed all of the other "crunchers" under their control if they are not limited as to how many machines they can have attached to this project. It doesn't make sense for one or a few people to "take" utter control of a public charity without some type of controls already set by the administrators. My point is, something needs to be done or you will possibly find asteroids@home minus several of it's crunchers because of the whims of a few people. It doesn't make sense. |
|
18)
(Message 2708)
Posted 12 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: They never grew quite that fast... |
|
19)
(Message 2707)
Posted 12 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: okay[/quote] |
|
20)
(Message 2702)
Posted 12 Mar 2014 by Andrew Davis Post: I have almost 60 validations waiting to be completed and it's growing everyday. I probably don't understand your question. I'm estimating. I was at about 7500 for avg./work at the end of last month. It's been consistently sliding since the server fix and application additions. I went back to 7.2.39, I was using 7.2.42 and I just wanted to see if there was any difference. It does appear to be working correctly for other clients, however. I'm very close to giving up on A@H... |
Next 20