Posts by Luigi R.
1)
(Message 7576)
Posted 16 Dec 2022 by Luigi R. Post: @Clint: well, I don't know if it's possible to improve something like "model efficiency" or "input data skimming"... only a project scientist can answer you. How do you figure out that 99% of data is junk if you don't crunch it? |
2)
(Message 7575)
Posted 16 Dec 2022 by Luigi R. Post: +1, rather +480 for fixed credits per wu again. If you don't care about credits, don't care about this thread. ;) |
3)
(Message 6080)
Posted 11 Dec 2018 by Luigi R. Post: Hi all, This one looks a sign of life to me. ;) http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/forum_thread.php?id=689#5909 |
4)
(Message 6079)
Posted 11 Dec 2018 by Luigi R. Post: The last paper published had figured about 1% of data had made models. I'd be interested to know if any key learning have been made. 99% data is a lot of cpu cycle that could be measuring gravitational waves, folding proteins, or modeling particle collisions. When you fold proteins for Rosetta, there is only 1 predictor of the day of 30k active users. Is all the rest of work garbage? Come on! |