Posts by Luigi R.

1) (Message 7576)
Posted 16 Dec 2022 by Luigi R.
Post:
@Clint: well, I don't know if it's possible to improve something like "model efficiency" or "input data skimming"... only a project scientist can answer you.

How do you figure out that 99% of data is junk if you don't crunch it?
2) (Message 7575)
Posted 16 Dec 2022 by Luigi R.
Post:
+1, rather +480 for fixed credits per wu again.

If you don't care about credits, don't care about this thread. ;)
3) (Message 6080)
Posted 11 Dec 2018 by Luigi R.
Post:
Hi all,
i recently started this project, but i don't see any update since 2015. Am I missing something or there is something going on?

I'll run it for several day more, but if no update were made i'll shut it down, and give my resources to some "live" project, i just don't see a point.

Please correct me if i am wrong.

This one looks a sign of life to me. ;)

http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/forum_thread.php?id=689#5909
4) (Message 6079)
Posted 11 Dec 2018 by Luigi R.
Post:
The last paper published had figured about 1% of data had made models. I'd be interested to know if any key learning have been made. 99% data is a lot of cpu cycle that could be measuring gravitational waves, folding proteins, or modeling particle collisions.

When you fold proteins for Rosetta, there is only 1 predictor of the day of 30k active users. Is all the rest of work garbage? Come on!