Posts by Rantanplan

1) (Message 5674)
Posted 12 Feb 2018 by Rantanplan
Post:
https://fallingstar.com/home.php

That`s the homepage -> there are the "cams":

http://dashboard.fallingstar.com/dash/mlo.html

http://dashboard.fallingstar.com/dash/hko.html

Watch that LIVE !!!

Greets
2) (Message 4945)
Posted 21 Jun 2016 by Rantanplan
Post:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/say-hello-to-the-worlds-first-1000-core-chip-that-runs-off-an-aa-battery/

Cruwl thing, but where can we will get that, have it disc or something else,
never a x86 architecture i think.

Greets, just spreding the news ;)
3) (Message 4844)
Posted 8 Apr 2016 by Rantanplan
Post:
Well folks,

Now see that result: (only Maxwell and Kepler support)

http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/result.php?resultid=111350431

There is only one download location left, sorry.
http://drivers.softpedia.com/downloadTag/NVIDIA%20GeForce%20Vulkan%20356.45%20Beta

It will have no effect on crunching end time
and will not save very much energy.

Just for counting the numbers ;D

Have fun !
4) (Message 4780)
Posted 7 Feb 2016 by Rantanplan
Post:
*its listed, sorry*
5) (Message 1604)
Posted 27 Aug 2013 by Rantanplan
Post:
ok , thx , i am trying about 5 cores now, must be then like hyperthreading on 25% each core, i will see the results.

No better results so far, i will adjust my bios settings now, what ever it is, perhaps i can fix it !?

It dont happen much, same result, i think it could better run on linux as on w7.

Arent it ? ;)
6) (Message 1599)
Posted 27 Aug 2013 by Rantanplan
Post:
oops, disgusting running times , reduced to 6 cores...

ok, now i got more moderate runtimes between 35 and 41 minutes per wu.

thats 10 to 16 minutes slower than running 4 cores...

Is that an advantage ?
7) (Message 1596)
Posted 27 Aug 2013 by Rantanplan
Post:
uuhhwww, i went wrong, is the "ncpu" option in BOINC, sorry...

ok changed ncpu to 8 cores using a i5 Ivy , all different results by running times, but shorter cpu time, courios..
8) (Message 1595)
Posted 27 Aug 2013 by Rantanplan
Post:
Question above !

Any interesting results ?

Greetings *wave*
9) (Message 918)
Posted 25 Feb 2013 by Rantanplan
Post:
ok, i calculated the cost by crunshing on rpi and an amd E350M1 Mainboard. The AMD cpu is more efficient than a rpi, almost by 100%. I stopped rpi crunshing.
10) (Message 871)
Posted 17 Feb 2013 by Rantanplan
Post:
http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/show_host_detail.php?hostid=11849

The other results i saw are not real ! Here is a real RPI Result. It took the PI to crunch in 80 hours, my goodness.
11) (Message 829)
Posted 11 Feb 2013 by Rantanplan
Post:
Hey folks ! :)

Whats up ? Anybody who can tell ?