Posts by Rantanplan
1)
(Message 5674)
Posted 12 Feb 2018 by Rantanplan Post: https://fallingstar.com/home.php That`s the homepage -> there are the "cams": http://dashboard.fallingstar.com/dash/mlo.html http://dashboard.fallingstar.com/dash/hko.html Watch that LIVE !!! Greets |
2)
(Message 4945)
Posted 21 Jun 2016 by Rantanplan Post: http://www.zdnet.com/article/say-hello-to-the-worlds-first-1000-core-chip-that-runs-off-an-aa-battery/ Cruwl thing, but where can we will get that, have it disc or something else, never a x86 architecture i think. Greets, just spreding the news ;) |
3)
(Message 4844)
Posted 8 Apr 2016 by Rantanplan Post: Well folks, Now see that result: (only Maxwell and Kepler support) http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/result.php?resultid=111350431 There is only one download location left, sorry. http://drivers.softpedia.com/downloadTag/NVIDIA%20GeForce%20Vulkan%20356.45%20Beta It will have no effect on crunching end time and will not save very much energy. Just for counting the numbers ;D Have fun ! |
4)
(Message 4780)
Posted 7 Feb 2016 by Rantanplan Post: *its listed, sorry* |
5)
Posted 27 Aug 2013 by Rantanplan Post: ok , thx , i am trying about 5 cores now, must be then like hyperthreading on 25% each core, i will see the results. No better results so far, i will adjust my bios settings now, what ever it is, perhaps i can fix it !? It dont happen much, same result, i think it could better run on linux as on w7. Arent it ? ;) |
6)
Posted 27 Aug 2013 by Rantanplan Post: oops, disgusting running times , reduced to 6 cores... ok, now i got more moderate runtimes between 35 and 41 minutes per wu. thats 10 to 16 minutes slower than running 4 cores... Is that an advantage ? |
7)
Posted 27 Aug 2013 by Rantanplan Post: uuhhwww, i went wrong, is the "ncpu" option in BOINC, sorry... ok changed ncpu to 8 cores using a i5 Ivy , all different results by running times, but shorter cpu time, courios.. |
8)
Posted 27 Aug 2013 by Rantanplan Post: Question above ! Any interesting results ? Greetings *wave* |
9)
(Message 918)
Posted 25 Feb 2013 by Rantanplan Post: ok, i calculated the cost by crunshing on rpi and an amd E350M1 Mainboard. The AMD cpu is more efficient than a rpi, almost by 100%. I stopped rpi crunshing. |
10)
(Message 871)
Posted 17 Feb 2013 by Rantanplan Post: http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/show_host_detail.php?hostid=11849 The other results i saw are not real ! Here is a real RPI Result. It took the PI to crunch in 80 hours, my goodness. |
11)
(Message 829)
Posted 11 Feb 2013 by Rantanplan Post: Hey folks ! :) Whats up ? Anybody who can tell ? |