Please support the Raspberry Pi (CPU).
Message boards :
Unix/Linux :
Please support the Raspberry Pi (CPU).
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 27 Jun 12 Posts: 129 Credit: 62,725,780 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 14 Dec 2012, 10:47:04 UTC what will you do with the spare? Development machine or maybe another cruncher :-) @Kyong, did you get the 512Mb or a 256Mb one? BOINC blog |
Send message Joined: 22 Sep 12 Posts: 13 Credit: 2,670,379 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 9 Jun 12 Posts: 584 Credit: 52,667,664 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 22 Sep 12 Posts: 13 Credit: 2,670,379 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 9 Jun 12 Posts: 584 Credit: 52,667,664 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 27 Jun 12 Posts: 129 Credit: 62,725,780 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 23 Dec 2012, 11:05:50 UTC It seems from the latest image on raspberrypi.org/downloads dated 16th of December that you can get the BOINC client and manager directly from the repo. The process to write the image onto the SD card is described on there. Once you've got your image on the SD card boot up your Pi with it. Go through the config (raspi-config) and get yourself to a command prompt. Type: sudo apt-get boinc-client sudo apt-get boinc-manager That's it you are updated and should now be able to attach to various projects using the 7.0.27 that you just got from the repo. Unfortunately it doesn't include this one yet, but I am sure Kyong is on the job :-) BOINC blog |
Send message Joined: 9 Jun 12 Posts: 584 Credit: 52,667,664 RAC: 0 |
I have already working application for Raspberry Pi now. Now I am just testing it with BOINC if anything is working. But there is a question if to release it. On the basic frequency of 700 MHz it has 24.873 % completed with time 17:31:40. So it seems that the computation will take about 85 hours.
|
Send message Joined: 27 Jun 12 Posts: 129 Credit: 62,725,780 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 26 Dec 2012, 10:48:08 UTC I have already working application for Raspberry Pi now. Now I am just testing it with BOINC if anything is working. But there is a question if to release it. On the basic frequency of 700 MHz it has 24.873 % completed with time 17:31:40. So it seems that the computation will take about 85 hours. Well we didn't expect it would be fast. My i7's are doing a work unit in around 2 hours 20 minutes so it's only about 40 times slower :( Maybe it's not using its capabilities, or maybe it is but it's so slow anyway. Does the science app use floating point or integer maths? You have used whatever compiler flag for the ARM hard float haven't you? BOINC blog |
Send message Joined: 9 Jun 12 Posts: 584 Credit: 52,667,664 RAC: 0 |
It uses floating point math. The computation time took 76 hours. But I will wait with releasing, in the latest changelog of BOINC source there is a new detection of ARM procesors so I am going to compile BOINC client from the source and test it. It is possible that it will detect the Raspberry Pi platform differently than now it does.
|
Send message Joined: 9 Jun 12 Posts: 584 Credit: 52,667,664 RAC: 0 |
I have released application for Raspberry Pi for Raspian so you can test it. You can notice that there are two versions, arm and armv6l. That is the problem I had written before. BOINC client in the repositories (7.0.27) detect the platform as arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf but in the latest source code there is changed detection for ARM processors so I compiled it and run and discovered that it is armv6l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf (7.1.0). I have to keep track the latest changes in source code because I think that in the future there can be detection for Raspberry so the architecture will be changed again.
|
Send message Joined: 27 Jun 12 Posts: 129 Credit: 62,725,780 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 12 Jan 2013, 7:39:28 UTC I have released application for Raspberry Pi for Raspian so you can test it. You can notice that there are two versions, arm and armv6l. That is the problem I had written before. BOINC client in the repositories (7.0.27) detect the platform as arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf but in the latest source code there is changed detection for ARM processors so I compiled it and run and discovered that it is armv6l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf (7.1.0). I have to keep track the latest changes in source code because I think that in the future there can be detection for Raspberry so the architecture will be changed again. Hi Kyong, Thanks for this. The first Pi I ordered back in August 2012 turned up this week. I have now got it crunching away. Hopefully it won't take 76 hours. I think I will do a mild overclock on it to see how it goes. I have BOINC 7.0.27 on it at the moment. BOINC blog |
Send message Joined: 19 Jun 12 Posts: 7 Credit: 840 RAC: 0 |
it seams the raspberry pi client works fine mine just completed its first unit in 51.3 hours overclocked to 1000mhz anyone done one faster ? http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/results.php?hostid=7458 |
Send message Joined: 22 Sep 12 Posts: 13 Credit: 2,670,379 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 27 Jun 12 Posts: 129 Credit: 62,725,780 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 18 Jan 2013, 12:37:05 UTC The first Pi I ordered back in August 2012 turned up this week. I have now got it crunching away. Hopefully it won't take 76 hours. I think I will do a mild overclock on it to see how it goes. I have BOINC 7.0.27 on it at the moment. First work unit took 76 hours with overclock set to modest. I have another one cooking at the moment with overclock set to medium this time, its about 1/3rd of the way through after 24 hours. Given it was 45 degrees here today (and I left the Pi running) I don't think I will take the overclock up much more. BOINC blog |
Send message Joined: 19 Jun 12 Posts: 7 Credit: 840 RAC: 0 |
my best is 49.6 hrs overclocked to 1023 mhz http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/results.php?hostid=7458 |
Send message Joined: 31 Jan 13 Posts: 3 Credit: 104,760 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 11 Feb 2013, 3:06:19 UTC Raspi @ 700/250/400 MHZ @ 1,2V -> 76,8 hours Raspi @ 1000/500/600 MHZ ; 1,35V ; force_turbo; 31° C coretemp -> 44,5 hours http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/results.php?hostid=11261 |
Send message Joined: 24 Jun 12 Posts: 6 Credit: 932,880 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 24 Jun 12 Posts: 6 Credit: 932,880 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 9 Jun 12 Posts: 584 Credit: 52,667,664 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 24 Jun 12 Posts: 6 Credit: 932,880 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 8 Mar 2013, 17:10:05 UTC What devices are ARM v5? There are currently arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf and armv6l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf applications. But I don't know which other devices have armv5. I have a NAS that uses an ARMv5. Since it's a NAS, it has no need of hardware FP, so its triple is similar to these, arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi, and requires applications to be built without hardware FP, but with software FP. Surely, there is a performance hit (1/3 of the performance), but such devices tend to have higher clocks and to not bother so much about power management (e.g., ARMv5 arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi vs. ARMv6 arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf). Yet, it's still capable of crunching numbers at the same speed as the typical PC when BOINC started and is comparable to a lowly Intel Atom. Thanks. |
Message boards :
Unix/Linux :
Please support the Raspberry Pi (CPU).