Why has the number of models gone down?
Message boards :
Science :
Why has the number of models gone down?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 17 Dec 12 Posts: 6 Credit: 3,889,080 RAC: 0 |
A few days ago there were over 800, and now there's 600 and some. I've been doing this project for awhile now, and it doesn't really seem like we're making progress. I think it's one of the most important projects I do, and I realize the user base isn't as large as many of the other projects ~ However.....the # of models and asteroids modeled......seems to go up and down, and at the end of the day it seems like a lot of the work we do might be junked? My WUs aren't showing up invalid, but.....I know how many asteroids are out there, and with the progress that we've been making we might be off earth by the time we get 90% of them figured out. |
Send message Joined: 9 Jun 12 Posts: 584 Credit: 52,667,664 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 28 Nov 2013, 16:51:30 UTC Well, I do not understand much what do you mean. There is still the same number of models in Scientific Results section. We are also processing many data but results are valid because the computation was right, but the "result" of the result doesn't have to be right. Data is usually very noisy because of high magnitude so there is low success of finding the right period, but without processing all data we can't know, what part and where is data for finding the right period, if any.
|
Send message Joined: 17 Dec 12 Posts: 6 Credit: 3,889,080 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 24 Aug 13 Posts: 111 Credit: 31,623,877 RAC: 1,213 |
Well, I do not understand much what do you mean. There is still the same number of models in Scientific Results section. We are also processing many data but results are valid because the computation was right, but the "result" of the result doesn't have to be right. Data is usually very noisy because of high magnitude so there is low success of finding the right period, but without processing all data we can't know, what part and where is data for finding the right period, if any. Interesting, roughly what % of data do you think yields results? Team AnandTech - SETI@H, Muon1 DPAD, Folding@H, MilkyWay@H, Asteroids@H, LHC@H, POGS, Rosetta@H, Einstein@H,DHPE & CPDN Main rig - Ryzen 3600, 32GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB, Win10 2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), Win7 |
Send message Joined: 18 Jun 12 Posts: 29 Credit: 5,504,007 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 24 Aug 13 Posts: 111 Credit: 31,623,877 RAC: 1,213 |
Wow! No wonder the table is a slow grower ;) Btw it would be interesting to know on that table how many results their are. Team AnandTech - SETI@H, Muon1 DPAD, Folding@H, MilkyWay@H, Asteroids@H, LHC@H, POGS, Rosetta@H, Einstein@H,DHPE & CPDN Main rig - Ryzen 3600, 32GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB, Win10 2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), Win7 |
Message boards :
Science :
Why has the number of models gone down?