GTX 780Ti ~2250 s http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/result.php?resultid=28194421
GTX Titan ~2300 s (recommended CUDA double precision disabled)
GTX 680 ~5300 s
GTX 650Ti ~8400 s
GTX 580 ~4200 s
GTX 570 ~3900-5000 s
GTX 480 ~4300-5300 s
GTX 560Ti ~5800 s
.
GTX 660M ~15000 s

It works also on Quadro series ?
I have this one:

NVIDIA GPU 0: Quadro FX 1800 (driver version 331.82, CUDA version 6.0, compute capability 1.1, 768MB, 8381137MB available, 264 GFLOPS peak)

but cannot get work:

30/12/2013 10:57:55 | Asteroids@home | Requesting new tasks for NVIDIA
30/12/2013 10:58:00 | Asteroids@home | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks

It works also on Quadro series ?
I have this one:

NVIDIA GPU 0: Quadro FX 1800 (driver version 331.82, CUDA version 6.0, compute capability 1.1, 768MB, 8381137MB available, 264 GFLOPS peak)

but cannot get work:

30/12/2013 10:57:55 | Asteroids@home | Requesting new tasks for NVIDIA
30/12/2013 10:58:00 | Asteroids@home | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks

No. Your card must be Compute capability 2.0 or better.

GTX 780Ti ~2250 s

Thanks

GTX 780Ti ~2250 s http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/result.php?resultid=28194421
GTX Titan ~2300 s (recommended CUDA double precision disabled)
GTX 680 ~5300 s
GTX 650Ti ~8400 s
GTX 580 ~4200 s
GTX 570 ~3900-5000 s
GTX 480 ~4300-5300 s
GTX 560Ti ~5800 s
.
GTX 660M ~15000 s
GT 635M ~35000 s (Linux) http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/result.php?resultid=27529265

Too slow than it is worth.

GTX 780Ti ~2250 s
GTX Titan ~2300 s (recommended CUDA double precision disabled)
GTX 680 ~5300 s
GTX 650Ti ~8400 s
GTX 580 ~4200 s
GTX 570 ~4200 s
GTX 560Ti ~5500 s
.
GTX 660M ~15000 s

.
.
.
in progress.

GTX770 3,616s
GTX670 4,980s

Win7 x64, 8GB DDR2133, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1265L V2 @ 2.50GHz (8threads)

28124806 11741759 5194 29 Dec 2013, 22:10:28 UTC 30 Dec 2013, 1:16:06 UTC Completed, waiting for validation 3,615.51 35.62 pending Period Search Application v100.00 (cuda55)

28038972 11728673 5194 29 Dec 2013, 18:46:25 UTC 29 Dec 2013, 21:48:12 UTC Completed and validated 4,980.47 41.03 480.00 Period Search Application v100.00 (cuda55)

MSI Afterburner (RivaTuner):
GPU power, 56% and 62%
GPU temperature, 63C and 47C
GPU usage, 98% and 97%
Core clock, 1163MHz and 1110MHz
GDDR clock, 3506MHz and 3005MHz
GDDR usage, 621MHz and 457MB


Regarding AVX vs SSE3, on an i73770K there seems to be from 3% to about 15% difference in run times. I expect you would need an ix-4xxx CPU to benefit fully from AVX code developments:

28194832 11760270 53841 30 Dec 2013, 0:47:58 UTC 30 Dec 2013, 4:06:53 UTC Completed and validated 8,747.55 8,665.78 480.00 Period Search Application v102.10 (sse3)
28194788 11755863 53841 30 Dec 2013, 0:47:58 UTC 30 Dec 2013, 4:06:53 UTC Completed, waiting for validation 7,855.23 7,774.79 pending Period Search Application v102.10 (sse3)
28136775 11746774 53841 29 Dec 2013, 22:36:14 UTC 30 Dec 2013, 2:58:03 UTC Completed and validated 7,588.37 7,517.23 480.00 Period Search Application v102.10 (avx)

If the GPU and CPU WU's are the same size, just different apps, then a GTX770 may be twice as fast as a single i7 CPU thread, but only has 1/4 the performance of the entire CPU. This seems to be the case because they get the same credit (480).

---

.

Regarding AVX vs SSE3, on an i73770K there seems to be from 3% to about 15% difference in run times. I expect you would need an ix-4xxx CPU to benefit fully from AVX code developments

Yes. AVX on 3xxx stuck on memory loading (CPU does two SSE3 op). AVX is for 4xxx CPUs.

If the WU's for the GPU and the CPU are the same, just different apps, then a GTX770 is twice as fast as a single i7 CPU thread, but only has 1/4 the performance of the entire CPU.

Yes. It is.

Regarding AVX vs SSE3, on an i73770K there seems to be from 3% to about 15% difference in run times. I expect you would need an ix-4xxx CPU to benefit fully from AVX code developments

Yes. AVX on 3xxx stuck on memory loading (CPU does two SSE3 op). AVX is for 4xxx CPUs.

If the WU's for the GPU and the CPU are the same, just different apps, then a GTX770 is twice as fast as a single i7 CPU thread, but only has 1/4 the performance of the entire CPU.

Yes. It is.

Then I don't understand why you launched this GPU app ?
Is it a test for a futur "different / new type of" WU's ?

Have tryed AVX WU's on an i7-4770K ... but I don't know why, very very slow +
only increasing the CPU temp. I guess one should run AVX on 4 cores only => no real gain <-> SSE3 on 8 cores ...

Wish you a Happy New Year !

Then I don't understand why you launched this GPU app ?

To give an option for crunchers to select "right" app and of course to explore usage of GPUs for next development.

Is it a test for a futur "different / new type of" WU's ?

Not for now, but we will see in future.

Have tryed AVX WU's on an i7-4770K ... but I don't know why, very very slow +
only increasing the CPU temp. I guess one should run AVX on 4 cores only => no real gain <-> SSE3 on 8 cores ...

HT cores share FPU units so no profit from HT.

For example:
cpus without HT like i5-4670 can make the same work with AVX as 4770 (SSE3,AVX) and has better power/price ratio.

Could we get an OpenCL-App for AMD GPUs too ?

Open-Cl is on our todo list. One of our volunteers decided to develop opencl app as shool project so we are waiting for him.

What about AVX-App on current AMD CPUs ?

You can try it with app_info, but AMD is very poor on AVX. AMD CPUs simulate AVX with SSE3.

Ack! 11,000-12,000 sec on my FX-8150 host with a 550Ti... :-( Can that be optimized?

---

It is a good news. You have done a wonderful Christmas gift! :) But - when will the release of the application for ATI (Radeon)?

Sorry, I do not read written above.

GT 540M ~32 000 s :-)

Ack! 11,000-12,000 sec on my FX-8150 host with a 550Ti... :-( Can that be optimized?

Sorry, no luck here. On CC2.X cards we are limited by block/SMX and registers/SMX so card occupancy is 67% and 550Ti has only 4 SMX. So 4*8 periods calculated in parallel.

My poor little GT610, which is probably one of the slowest GPUs on this project, doesn't think that the new app is very fast.
It took nearly 17 hours to do one work unit, compared with my CPU, which can finish two work units in less than 2½ hours!

610 is very slow, I have three 610 with passive cooling at work.

Ack! 11,000-12,000 sec on my FX-8150 host with a 550Ti... :-( Can that be optimized?

Sorry, no luck here. On CC2.X cards we are limited by block/SMX and registers/SMX so card occupancy is 67% and 550Ti has only 4 SMX. So 4*8 periods calculated in parallel.

Thanks for the feedback. :-)

Oh, well...I guess I'll keep that GPU running Einstein.

---

30.12.2013 23:51:51 |  | CUDA: NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTS 450 (driver version 327.23, CUDA version 5.5, compute capability 2.1, 1024MB, 925MB available, 637 GFLOPS peak)
30.12.2013 23:53:27 | Asteroids@home | Requesting new tasks for NVIDIA
30.12.2013 23:53:29 | Asteroids@home | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks

What's wrong?

30.12.2013 23:51:51 |  | CUDA: NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTS 450 (driver version 327.23, CUDA version 5.5, compute capability 2.1, 1024MB, 925MB available, 637 GFLOPS peak)
30.12.2013 23:53:27 | Asteroids@home | Requesting new tasks for NVIDIA
30.12.2013 23:53:29 | Asteroids@home | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks

What's wrong?

see if it helps

http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/forum_thread.php?id=234

Great news for the project, but to be honest I am somewhat disappointed by the performance of mid-range card. I guess I will be sticking around with my CPU somewhat longer...

Great news for the project, but to be honest I am somewhat disappointed by the performance of mid-range card. I guess I will be sticking around with my CPU somewhat longer...

These are expected results. GPUs are very specialized and it's hard to fit code to every hw architecture.