WU's length



Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.
AuthorMessage
Profile [AF>Amis des Lapins] Phil1966

Send message
Joined: 10 Jul 13
Posts: 21
Credit: 10,363,957
RAC: 0
Message 3835 - Posted: 30 Nov 2014, 6:28:17 UTC

Last modified: 30 Nov 2014, 6:30:15 UTC
Hello,

could someone explain to me why there are so many changes in the WU's lenght ?

Below instances = AVX, (all on the same machine - ID 54940 !) but same happens with SSE2 and SSE3 : ALL WU's need > 2x more time to complete than 4 or 5 days ago ... ?

Thank You



54594862 23583313 24 Nov 2014, 18:50:57 UTC 26 Nov 2014, 6:42:01 UTC Terminé et validé 2,752.98 2,725.56 480.00 Period Search Application

54594807 23583289 24 Nov 2014, 18:50:57 UTC 26 Nov 2014, 6:42:01 UTC Terminé et validé 2,808.27 2,779.88 480.00 Period Search Application

54589306 23580566 24 Nov 2014, 18:28:10 UTC 26 Nov 2014, 6:42:01 UTC Terminé et validé 2,951.73 2,922.96 480.00 Period Search Application




56074104 24296773 29 Nov 2014, 20:03:37 UTC 30 Nov 2014, 2:17:07 UTC Terminé et validé 7,282.37 7,203.83 480.00 Period Search Application

56074360 24296907 29 Nov 2014, 20:03:37 UTC 30 Nov 2014, 0:15:43 UTC Terminé et validé 7,424.55 7,312.80 480.00 Period Search Application

56074210 24296854 29 Nov 2014, 20:03:37 UTC 30 Nov 2014, 4:21:07 UTC Terminé et validé 7,585.05 7,400.72 480.00 Period Search Application
ID: 3835 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Eugene Stemple

Send message
Joined: 17 Nov 14
Posts: 13
Credit: 6,630,897
RAC: 1,792
Message 3842 - Posted: 2 Dec 2014, 16:35:27 UTC
I also notice a recent (approximate) double in run times. But when I look back farther in the logs I see that in early November the "short" runs began to replace "long" runs that had been typical up to that time. So, in effect, the WU size seems to have reverted back to a previous value. Who knows what the "right" size is? I just assumed it is something inherent in the batches of work that are distributed.
ID: 3842 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile mikey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Jan 14
Posts: 302
Credit: 32,696,384
RAC: 2,320
Message 3845 - Posted: 3 Dec 2014, 12:30:04 UTC - in response to Message 3842.  
I also notice a recent (approximate) double in run times. But when I look back farther in the logs I see that in early November the "short" runs began to replace "long" runs that had been typical up to that time. So, in effect, the WU size seems to have reverted back to a previous value. Who knows what the "right" size is? I just assumed it is something inherent in the batches of work that are distributed.


Longer units also means less times we users have to connect to the Project Servers, they have been overloaded at times so this could be a return to the longer units to help solve the problem.
ID: 3845 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote