Badges


Message boards : News : Badges

Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3
AuthorMessage
Composer

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 14
Posts: 20
Credit: 753,120
RAC: 0
Message 6361 - Posted: 24 Sep 2019, 15:37:19 UTC - in response to Message 6329.  
I like the idea of a badge that is awarded not for points, but for number of models produced. I could see it as a separate badge with just a single number in the middle that increases for each valid model you produce.

My understanding is that much of the data that is processed fails to produce a valid model, and that even when a data set DOES produce a valid model, there are a lot of computational "dead ends" that occur along the way, so an individual actually identifying a valid model is pretty uncommon when compared to all other possible outcomes.

I know its about the scientific results in the end, but if it isn't too difficult to implement, it doesn't hurt to have a little "reward" for the users.
ID: 6361 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
mmonnin

Send message
Joined: 3 Aug 16
Posts: 19
Credit: 51,526,913
RAC: 568
Message 6363 - Posted: 24 Sep 2019, 21:58:09 UTC
Some projects have something like this if you find a Prime, special # or have crunch data used in research. PrimeGrid, GPUGrid, RakeSearch, DHEP, Amicable, Xansons, ODLK, Latin Squares (ODLK1), Pogs, SRBase are some that I see.
ID: 6363 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
wolfman1360

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 17
Posts: 13
Credit: 44,071,565
RAC: 0
Message 6376 - Posted: 5 Oct 2019, 17:26:03 UTC - in response to Message 6361.  
I like the idea of a badge that is awarded not for points, but for number of models produced. I could see it as a separate badge with just a single number in the middle that increases for each valid model you produce.

My understanding is that much of the data that is processed fails to produce a valid model, and that even when a data set DOES produce a valid model, there are a lot of computational "dead ends" that occur along the way, so an individual actually identifying a valid model is pretty uncommon when compared to all other possible outcomes.

I know its about the scientific results in the end, but if it isn't too difficult to implement, it doesn't hurt to have a little "reward" for the users.

I love that idea! That would certainly give me more incentive.
ID: 6376 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Nick8888

Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 17
Posts: 3
Credit: 552,000
RAC: 0
Message 6377 - Posted: 5 Oct 2019, 19:00:32 UTC - in response to Message 6334.  
Me want Dino-Killer asteroid for hitting a billion.
https://www.nhm.ac.uk/content/dam/nhmwww/discover/dinosaur-extinction/dino-extinction-asteroid-impact-full-width.jpg




Lmao, as if the asteroid was THAT BIG. Man that picture is stupid.
ID: 6377 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Aurum

Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 17
Posts: 22
Credit: 333,302,879
RAC: 0
Message 6391 - Posted: 13 Oct 2019, 19:09:16 UTC - in response to Message 6377.  
Me want Dino-Killer asteroid for hitting a billion.
https://www.nhm.ac.uk/content/dam/nhmwww/discover/dinosaur-extinction/dino-extinction-asteroid-impact-full-width.jpg



Lmao, as if the asteroid was THAT BIG. Man that picture is stupid.

The Chicxulub asteroid was about 110 miles in diameter. The scale looks about right. What they screwed up was they made the diameter of the Earth too small.
ID: 6391 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile mikey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Jan 14
Posts: 300
Credit: 32,426,657
RAC: 3,552
Message 7486 - Posted: 27 Nov 2022, 5:06:22 UTC - in response to Message 349.  

Last modified: 27 Nov 2022, 5:08:07 UTC
C ... 10K
Si ... 100K
Fe ... 500K
Ni ... 1M
Co ... 5M
Pd ... 10M
Au ... 50M
Ir ... 100M


Let's bubble this back up to the top and see what happens
ID: 7486 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Keith Myers
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Nov 22
Posts: 104
Credit: 65,684,655
RAC: 368,928
Message 7492 - Posted: 27 Nov 2022, 17:30:57 UTC - in response to Message 7487.  
It never started. The work we processed was generated in 2021.

They haven't started generating new work yet.

Hopeful that Monday will show up with new work as they posted.

A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association)
ID: 7492 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Keith Myers
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Nov 22
Posts: 104
Credit: 65,684,655
RAC: 368,928
Message 7569 - Posted: 14 Dec 2022, 21:30:06 UTC
Progressing nicely in my badge pursuit. Up to Fe and on the way to Ni and 1M.
Should get my Nickel badge at the start of the New Year.

A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association)
ID: 7569 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Georgi Vidinski
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Nov 17
Posts: 159
Credit: 13,180,466
RAC: 1
Message 7571 - Posted: 14 Dec 2022, 22:36:18 UTC - in response to Message 7570.  
I've got 5, up to Cobalt. But they're not shown on the left in here :-(

Just out of a curiosity what do you mean?
“The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson
ID: 7571 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

Message boards : News : Badges