New workunits
Message boards :
News :
New workunits
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 19 Nov 13 Posts: 6 Credit: 10,733,998 RAC: 188 |
No way to "avoid this d/l problem" - files either do not exist on the server, have a wrong filename, are empty or are in the wrong directory. Among the many "download failed" WUs I do get a few WUs that work. I've even crunched some and sent them back, so I think from my perspective continuing to try is worthwhile. I'm not sure how much work I'm inadvertently causing the Admins, though. |
Send message Joined: 6 Mar 14 Posts: 58 Credit: 5,931,360 RAC: 0 |
800 of my last 940 workunits failed to download correctly. Meanwhile, I'm running the others, with no problems, about 2 hours each as usual. I have 38 waiting for validation. My current queue has 4 running, 4 waiting to run, and 24 download failed. So, OK, I'm making progress again - with only 11% download-success rate in the past 24 hours. |
Send message Joined: 6 Mar 14 Posts: 58 Credit: 5,931,360 RAC: 0 |
This looks bad now: 2 tasks running & 32 downloads failed for the same reasons many of us are citing. I aborted all the failed tasks, 32 more downloaded and *** all failed ** So I have 2 running and it sure looks like *all* downloads are now failing for me. I will try resetting the project if I see 34 failed downloads & nothing running. ============== Getting these: 3/20/2015 9:17:36 PM | Asteroids@home | Started download of input_1590_49 3/20/2015 9:17:36 PM | Asteroids@home | [error] File input_1590_53 has wrong size: expected 55719, got 0 3/20/2015 9:17:36 PM | Asteroids@home | [error] Checksum or signature error for input_1590_53 3/20/2015 9:17:36 PM | Asteroids@home | [error] File input_1590_51 has wrong size: expected 55719, got 0 3/20/2015 9:17:36 PM | Asteroids@home | [error] Checksum or signature error for input_1590_51 3/20/2015 9:17:38 PM | Asteroids@home | Incomplete read of 39.000000 < 5KB for input_1590_5 - truncating 3/20/2015 9:17:38 PM | Asteroids@home | Incomplete read of 39.000000 < 5KB for input_1590_49 - truncating |
Send message Joined: 27 Jun 12 Posts: 129 Credit: 62,725,780 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 21 Mar 2015, 6:19:23 UTC Like everyone else getting lots of download failures. I'm running the following script on my Windows machines. Its basically using BOINCCMD (the command-line tool that comes with BOINC) to hit the update button every 2 minutes. Cut and paste it into Notepad and save as a text file as something like aster.bat and then run it. echo Script to get/report Asteroids tasks :1 "C:\Program Files\BOINC\boinccmd" --project http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc update timeout 120 goto 1 BOINC blog |
Send message Joined: 2 May 14 Posts: 4 Credit: 6,603,840 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 31 May 14 Posts: 1 Credit: 18,332,472 RAC: 1,338 |
|
Send message Joined: 19 Jun 12 Posts: 221 Credit: 623,640 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 19 Jun 12 Posts: 221 Credit: 623,640 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 21 Mar 2015, 10:05:26 UTC "C:\Program Files\BOINC\boinccmd" --project http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc update I don't see how this will be of help for the Download problem. (and just Copy/Paste will not work if boinccmd is not in the default place, 'timeout' is not present on every system) P.S. I use similar force-update (times in seconds) but by BoincTasks (in config.xml in the install directory of BoincTasks): <config> <refresh> <downloads> 1709 </downloads> <uploads> 1307 </uploads> <refresh> 3571 </refresh> <refresh_asap> 1399 </refresh_asap> </refresh> </config> - ALF - "Find out what you don't do well ..... then don't do it!" :) |
Send message Joined: 28 Sep 13 Posts: 29 Credit: 120,812,063 RAC: 7,367 |
I'm running 8 machines and have the same problem with downloads.. but enough get through to keep them busy.. however, on this machine, I did 71 WU completed in 24 hours but only have 400 credits.. so validation must be taking awhile, too.. bet Kyong is busy, and I wish I knew how to help.
|
Send message Joined: 1 Apr 13 Posts: 37 Credit: 153,496,537 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 6 Mar 14 Posts: 58 Credit: 5,931,360 RAC: 0 |
Just now my work queue had 30 download failures of 30 tasks. Twice, I aborted all failures & then got 30 more download failures. 90 of 90 for 100% failures. Aborted all again have 1 running & 29 download failures. etc. etc. Yes, the failure rate is very high. I hope these tasks will be "recycled" & run eventually? |
Send message Joined: 19 Jun 12 Posts: 20 Credit: 18,696,298 RAC: 2,414 |
Last modified: 21 Mar 2015, 19:28:48 UTC |
Send message Joined: 17 Mar 15 Posts: 6 Credit: 11,520 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 21 Mar 2015, 19:58:11 UTC |
Send message Joined: 27 Jun 12 Posts: 129 Credit: 62,725,780 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 21 Mar 2015, 22:15:51 UTC Just now my work queue had 30 download failures of 30 tasks. Twice, I aborted all failures & then got 30 more download failures. 90 of 90 for 100% failures. Aborted all again have 1 running & 29 download failures. etc. etc. You don't need to abort them, just reporting them is sufficient seeing as they failed to download. Just hit the update button on the project tab or use one of the scripts given earlier in this thread. They need to fail 7 times before they are flagged as being in error and then the system will stop trying to send them out. BOINC blog |
Send message Joined: 6 Mar 14 Posts: 58 Credit: 5,931,360 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 19 Jun 12 Posts: 221 Credit: 623,640 RAC: 0 |
Something more strange - a WU file was available (and task done by me) on 17 Mar 2015 but then vanished on 21 Mar 2015 so ended with "Too many errors (may have bug)": http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/workunit.php?wuid=27974151 Seems to me something (script? file_deleter?) on the server deletes files too early ... - ALF - "Find out what you don't do well ..... then don't do it!" :) |
Send message Joined: 28 Sep 13 Posts: 29 Credit: 120,812,063 RAC: 7,367 |
Another thing kind of odd... When I looked, I had about 7 or 8 tasks waiting to report. When I did an update to Asteroids in BOINC, and then looked at the events log, it reported that I had 41 completed TASKS instead of the 6, 7, or 8 that actually was sent. Are some of the tasks not reported or delayed? and this is just an outstanding number? When I reported earlier that one of my machines reported 71 tasks in a 24 hour period - that would be impossible, as it can really only do about 10 in 24 hours. |
Send message Joined: 9 Jun 12 Posts: 584 Credit: 52,667,664 RAC: 0 |
I am sorry that there are download errors again. I have checked how the BOINC server is checking the input files that have the same input name as before. The problem is at part files that have already been processed before but not at all of them. So I am going to change naming scheme because of that. New batch of workunits will have different naming scheme so it should finally work without any download errors.
|
Send message Joined: 28 Sep 13 Posts: 29 Credit: 120,812,063 RAC: 7,367 |
|
Send message Joined: 30 May 14 Posts: 6 Credit: 31,978,085 RAC: 0 |
|
Message boards :
News :
New workunits