no WUs
Message boards :
Number crunching :
no WUs
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 1 Apr 13 Posts: 37 Credit: 153,496,537 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 30 May 14 Posts: 6 Credit: 31,978,085 RAC: 593 |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Nov 14 Posts: 5 Credit: 1,202,774 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 16 Feb 13 Posts: 5 Credit: 135,915,374 RAC: 0 |
still no work units. Reasons?Because this project is hosted and run by a volunteer who already has a life, a job, gives what free time he can to this project and sometimes he has other priorities? Just guessing :) That is absolutely correct!! Plus he is tends to be a very busy person as well. |
Send message Joined: 16 Feb 13 Posts: 5 Credit: 135,915,374 RAC: 0 |
still no work units. Reasons?Because this project is hosted and run by a volunteer who already has a life, a job, gives what free time he can to this project and sometimes he has other priorities? Just guessing :) That is absolutely correct!! Plus he is tends to be a very busy person as well. |
Send message Joined: 23 Oct 15 Posts: 5 Credit: 752,640 RAC: 0 |
WUs are becoming available, but slowly... if you look at the server status, there are nearly a quarter of a million WUs out for processing, and all of the ones I'm getting are for 'validation'. If you don't connect to the server very often, other people grab them up before you. It looks like there are a lot of people out there who are 'holding on to' very large queues of first-run WUs, and starving out everyone else. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 9 Jun 12 Posts: 584 Credit: 52,667,664 RAC: 0 |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 8 Sep 13 Posts: 71 Credit: 15,807,240 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 8 Jan 13 Posts: 39 Credit: 71,028,120 RAC: 0 |
Which machine is going to be replaced? Hosts project1: IBM x3550 M4 (1 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 2.00 GHz, 96 (12 x 8) GB RAM (1333 MHz) 8 x 600 GB IBM SAS 10000 rpm (RAID5) OS Debian Jessie) project2: IBM x3550 M4 (1 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 2.00 GHz, 64 (4 x 16) GB RAM (1333 MHz) 3 x 600 GB IBM SAS 10000 rpm (RAID5) OS Debian Jessie) What`s the load/tresholds on cpu/ram/hdd on mentioned machines? i think stats like that will interest more members here.. thanks |
Send message Joined: 11 Sep 12 Posts: 21 Credit: 6,034,800 RAC: 1,457 |
26-3-2018 08:03:20 | Asteroids@home | Started upload of ps_180322_input_100507_20_1_0 26-3-2018 08:03:22 | Asteroids@home | [error] Error reported by file upload server: Server is out of disk space 26-3-2018 08:03:22 | Asteroids@home | Temporarily failed upload of ps_180322_input_100507_20_1_0: transient upload error 26-3-2018 08:03:22 | Asteroids@home | Backing off 04:15:55 on upload of ps_180322_input_100507_20_1_0 ![]() |
Send message Joined: 3 May 14 Posts: 1 Credit: 417,600 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Nov 13 Posts: 7 Credit: 4,149,612 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 4 May 2018, 20:12:26 UTC |
Send message Joined: 26 Jan 13 Posts: 3 Credit: 5,518,177 RAC: 0 |
I have already written serveral times that if there are no WUs, we are aware of it. Asteroids should get a new server in the summer so it should solve problems with free space which is the reason why the work isn't always available to send. Is there anything we can do to minimize this problem? Does aborting incomplete work help or hurt? What about uploading and reporting completed tasks? |
![]() Send message Joined: 20 Jun 12 Posts: 10 Credit: 54,140,713 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 14 May 2018, 16:33:31 UTC |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 22 Jun 12 Posts: 21 Credit: 6,288,600 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 20 Jun 12 Posts: 11 Credit: 59,773,085 RAC: 131 |
|
Send message Joined: 13 Jul 17 Posts: 11 Credit: 68,633,259 RAC: 81 |
On November 13, jiri kovar wrote: There are some day breaks between pakages of work. The more people follow this advice, the more server disk space you are going to need. On March 12, Kyong wrote: I have already written serveral times that if there are no WUs, we are aware of it. Asteroids should get a new server in the summer so it should solve problems with free space which is the reason why the work isn't always available to send. What are your average task turnaround times? If it is more than, say, 2 or 3 days, then consider decreasing your task deadline, which is currently 10.5 days. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 2 Mar 14 Posts: 16 Credit: 11,632,800 RAC: 0 |
Maybe them Big Mining Teams have taken all the Tasks. Or the Big Boys are Bunking them for Formula BOINC Sprit Today. http://formula-boinc.org/sprint.py?sprint=8&lang=en&year=2018 ![]() Crunching@EVGA The Number One Team in the BOINC Community. Folding@EVGA The Number One Team in the Folding@Home Community. |
Send message Joined: 14 May 13 Posts: 7 Credit: 13,954,668 RAC: 14 |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 2 Mar 14 Posts: 16 Credit: 11,632,800 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 21 Jun 2018, 19:45:21 UTC Is there no Limit per Host? Not that I have seem, but look at users like CharityEngine1 & CharityEngine2 (Gridcoin) along with grcpool.com(0,1,2,3) hundreds of users computers or hosts that run under the same User ID so IMO Ming has taken over BOINC for the most part and left out what was the Normal Team. So one Team Member (Not A Team) can have hundreds of Members with from 1 to 50 Hosts Each all running as One Member, and that should be a Team AND not a Single User or Single Member. Kind of makes Team Useless or Meaningless anymore. But then Some Normal Teams have Mining Members that Run for their Teams for Events and Challenges that you see through the BOINC Year. "Is there no Limit per Host?" Some Team Members (Not Teams) have 1000+ Host Per Team Member but there are 100s of real users that run under a Single Team Member. ![]() Crunching@EVGA The Number One Team in the BOINC Community. Folding@EVGA The Number One Team in the Folding@Home Community. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
no WUs