Did anybody completed a wu on a Raspberry Pi ?
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Did anybody completed a wu on a Raspberry Pi ?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 11 Feb 13 Posts: 11 Credit: 5,104,146 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 16 Aug 12 Posts: 293 Credit: 1,116,280 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 19 Jun 12 Posts: 221 Credit: 623,640 RAC: 0 |
There is also one here called "51.3 hours on a raspberry pi": http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/forum_thread.php?id=65 - ALF - "Find out what you don't do well ..... then don't do it!" :) |
Send message Joined: 16 Aug 12 Posts: 293 Credit: 1,116,280 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Feb 13 Posts: 11 Credit: 5,104,146 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 17 Feb 2013, 9:15:22 UTC http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/show_host_detail.php?hostid=11849 The other results i saw are not real ! Here is a real RPI Result. It took the PI to crunch in 80 hours, my goodness. |
Send message Joined: 19 Jun 12 Posts: 221 Credit: 623,640 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 17 Feb 2013, 9:57:21 UTC The other results i saw are not real ! What do you mean by "not real"? If you mean "some tasks were done by overclocked CPUs" that do not make the results "not real" http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/results.php?hostid=7458 http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/results.php?hostid=5293 http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/results.php?hostid=9503 http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/results.php?hostid=11268 http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/results.php?hostid=10218&offset=0&show_names=0&state=4&appid= http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/hosts_user.php?userid=6590 This is ~equal in time with yours: http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/results.php?hostid=7663 And this is slower than yours: http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/results.php?hostid=7322 - ALF - "Find out what you don't do well ..... then don't do it!" :) |
Send message Joined: 31 Jan 13 Posts: 3 Credit: 104,760 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Feb 13 Posts: 11 Credit: 5,104,146 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 25 Feb 2013, 14:33:46 UTC |
Send message Joined: 27 Jun 12 Posts: 129 Credit: 62,725,780 RAC: 0 |
The main cost savings come from a cheap purchase price (the Pi only costs $35) and the low power consumption. Some people run them off solar panels but not me. Yes they are slow but can be over clocked by a fair margin. BOINC blog |
Send message Joined: 16 Aug 12 Posts: 293 Credit: 1,116,280 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 22 Sep 12 Posts: 13 Credit: 2,670,379 RAC: 0 |
The main cost savings come from a cheap purchase price (the Pi only costs $35) and the low power consumption. Some people run them off solar panels but not me. And some people run them off batteries! Just get necessary cooling and you can overclock to 2.5 Ghz without any problems. :) Happy crunching! |
Send message Joined: 7 Jul 13 Posts: 2 Credit: 7,680 RAC: 0 |
Well today my raspi completed its first WU. Good raspi. Good boy. Good boy. I bought a fan with a hefty clip from a hydroponics shop to help cool a large desktop. It is quite quiet and has two speeds. One of these would certainly move the air around a Pi. I also put 4 transparent rubber feet on the bottom panel to lift it more and to make it less likely to skate. usefulramblings |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Did anybody completed a wu on a Raspberry Pi ?