New CUDA102 application was released
Message boards :
News :
New CUDA102 application was released
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 9 Jun 12 Posts: 584 Credit: 52,667,664 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 19 Jun 12 Posts: 1 Credit: 1,154,640 RAC: 0 |
I've tried it out and can confirm that the CPU usage is significantly lower. Here are some results from my machine. GTX 1070 and GTX 1050Ti on Ryzen 3700X. |
![]() Send message Joined: 26 Jan 20 Posts: 1 Credit: 938,058 RAC: 35 |
I'm not sure how to tell if my installation is using (or indeed, can use) a "CUDA" version. It's just running on a laptop at the moment, no idea if it uses any fancy graphics card of any sort, CUDA or not (if that is a graphics card type?). Is there a download link, or does the BOINC manager download the updates automatically? |
![]() Send message Joined: 24 Aug 13 Posts: 111 Credit: 30,969,821 RAC: 9,828 |
CUDA is for Nvidia GPUs. I would think it'd automatically d/l the app if you have the right GPU. You could use GPU-Z to see which GPU you have. Team AnandTech - SETI@H, Muon1 DPAD, Folding@H, MilkyWay@H, Asteroids@H, LHC@H, POGS, Rosetta@H, Einstein@H,DHPE & CPDN Main rig - Ryzen 3600, 32GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB, Win10 2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), Win7 |
![]() Send message Joined: 23 Jan 13 Posts: 3 Credit: 16,397,650 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 22 Apr 20 Posts: 2 Credit: 1,425,120 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 22 Apr 20 Posts: 2 Credit: 1,425,120 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 2 May 14 Posts: 1 Credit: 893,280 RAC: 0 |
Last modified: 27 Apr 2020, 6:09:17 UTC Hello, It takes me twice as long to process the work units as with Cuda55! Regards Klaus http://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/results.php?userid=57813 |
Send message Joined: 3 Apr 20 Posts: 1 Credit: 54,429,625 RAC: 36,203 |
|
Send message Joined: 16 May 20 Posts: 3 Credit: 262,560 RAC: 0 |
Hi folks Relatively new to Asteroids@home since the "passing" of SETI (wipes away a tear) but cannot see why my work done is still at zero. The (three) other projects I'm working on are showing as active but nothing on Asteroids..... It's not showing as suspended or anything else obvious, but if anyone would be so kind as to remind me what other basics I should be checking, it would be greatly appreciated. Many thank yous. Nick |
Send message Joined: 12 Oct 14 Posts: 6 Credit: 160,577,150 RAC: 18,205 |
Last modified: 17 May 2020, 18:05:06 UTC Work units are sent to two computers, which must both send back the result. Then the results are compared and validated. You have sent back 1 result that could be validated. Therefore you have 480 credits. Then you have sent back another 5 results, which wait for the second cruncher to send in the result. When they turn up, your work will be validated. They have up to 10.5 days to do so. You have done nothing wrong and there is nothing that you must or can do. You just need to wait. Everyone has at any time pending units. I have currently 261 units waiting to be validated. No problem. |
Send message Joined: 16 May 20 Posts: 3 Credit: 262,560 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 12 Oct 14 Posts: 6 Credit: 160,577,150 RAC: 18,205 |
|
Send message Joined: 16 May 20 Posts: 3 Credit: 262,560 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 6 Mar 20 Posts: 1 Credit: 232,320 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Apr 18 Posts: 20 Credit: 11,317,345 RAC: 7,217 |
I have seen multiple comments regarding a doubling of run time on the new work units compared to the CUDA55 units. I am seeing the same thing, though the variation seems to be from double to triple the run time. This isn't encouraging and suggests the new app is poorly optimised. If this matter could be passed up to the devs for revision that would be much appreciated by the volunteers. |
Send message Joined: 10 Nov 19 Posts: 2 Credit: 6,686,880 RAC: 0 |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 18 Jun 12 Posts: 23 Credit: 5,455,486 RAC: 0 |
|
Message boards :
News :
New CUDA102 application was released