Posts by San-Fernando-Valley
|
1)
(Message 7682)
Posted 9 Jan 2023 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: Peter, just an info: my old Nvidia GPUs are running at more or less 100% with ONE task. So not much to do about that .... |
|
2)
(Message 7681)
Posted 9 Jan 2023 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: Peter, thanks for the good and clear reply. BUT, since I am not running more than one CPU task at a time, my "statement" is "correct". I'm running other things on the remaining cores. Thanks again and have a great day. P.S. the "friendly repIies" did not pertain to you - but I think the message came over pretty clear - for the others .... |
|
3)
(Message 7675)
Posted 8 Jan 2023 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: Hi Peter, I'm getting even more confused now. My GPU tasks are using one core - same as my CPU tasks. Friendly HELP needed ... Cheers |
|
4)
(Message 7673)
Posted 8 Jan 2023 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: And I don't understand your reply. I said "second PC" - which sort of implies I also used a "first PC". My interpretation of the previous discussion is that the posters claimed CPUs are running faster than GPUs on this project. I will re-explain my scenario. I have used two separate PCs. On PC "A" a GPU task is faster than a CPU task. On PC "B" a GPU task is also faster than a CPU task. So I don't agree with the statements that the CPUs are way faster than the GPUs on this project. But, I'm defintely sure you can put me on the right path of enlightment ... |
|
5)
(Message 7671)
Posted 8 Jan 2023 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: Beeing curious, I just did a couple of CPU tasks. Always same surrounding, tasks running alone, one task per GPU. 3070 GPU -- around 10 minutes (elapsed time), but Xeon W 2245 CPU -- around 36 minutes (elapsed time). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Second PC TITAN V -- approx. 4 minutes but Xeon W 2245 CPU -- approx. 37 minutes. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran several tasks. Where is my error in thinking? Replies welcome ... |
|
6)
Posted 2 Jan 2023 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: Nobbyyyy: Perhaps you could use both GPUs in one host? Just a thought ... |
|
7)
Posted 2 Jan 2023 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: Zark: I have a GTX Titan, a GTX 1070, a GT 1030, and a Quadro K5000, and Milkyway for GPU has no problems with these cards. Are you saying that one host/computer has all 4 GPUs installed and running fine? Because the post title says "... host with multiple NVIDIA devices ..." For the Quadro K5000 the stderr says: UDA Device: Quadro K5000 4096MB CUDA Device driver: 462.96 Compute capability: 3.0 Shared memory per Block | per SM: 49152 | 49152 Multiprocessors: 8 Unsupported Compute Capability (CC) detected (3.0). Supported Compute Capabilities are between 5.3 and 8.9. So maybe MW has different CC requirements? Check again the last post from Georgi ... |
|
8)
(Message 7659)
Posted 2 Jan 2023 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: +1 |
|
9)
(Message 7658)
Posted 2 Jan 2023 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: ... ? |
|
10)
(Message 7657)
Posted 2 Jan 2023 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: ... That sounds plausible, acceptable and is very OK. Never thought about it from that perspectiv. Thanks for the reply ... |
|
11)
Posted 24 Dec 2022 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: nobbyyyy: Are you really using NVIDIA driver 512.78 ?? I'm wondering if a driver update would help (527.56) ?? Just a thought ... |
|
12)
(Message 7584)
Posted 20 Dec 2022 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: Welcome and thank you ... |
|
13)
(Message 7581)
Posted 19 Dec 2022 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: Notice: Undefined variable: title in /home/boincadm/projects/boinc/html/user/forum_forum.php on line 227 Notice: Undefined variable: alt in /home/boincadm/projects/boinc/html/user/forum_forum.php on line 227 Notice: Undefined variable: src in /home/boincadm/projects/boinc/html/user/forum_forum.php on line 227 Notice: Undefined variable: h in /home/boincadm/projects/boinc/html/user/forum_forum.php on line 227 |
|
14)
(Message 7561)
Posted 9 Dec 2022 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: no tasks to send ... |
|
15)
(Message 7560)
Posted 9 Dec 2022 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: I think that most users are processing work for the science ... I sort of don't understand what you are trying to say or point out? Are you crunching for science ("discoveries") or a big bang (credits)? I probably misunderstood you. Sorry. |
|
16)
(Message 7543)
Posted 6 Dec 2022 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: Mayber I'm "old fashioned" or just "dumb" or whatever, but I crunch for the "worth" of scientific results and not for "meaningless" credits. Sorry ... |
|
17)
(Message 7540)
Posted 5 Dec 2022 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: Strange. Everybody is complaining when there are no WUs available, which is understandable. But it looks like nobody is happy when they're back. Or it's like having a conversation with mouth full :)? I'm definitely not complaining - never ever! I'm very happy that the project is "back". Thanks to all for the good work. The "presentation" of your home page is very good. A pleasure to look at. So, keep it up ... Remember: As long as crunchers are complaining, well, you at least know they need you ... cheers |
|
18)
(Message 6754)
Posted 26 May 2020 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: Trying to logon give us repeatedly connecting time out errors. VERY poor response times. AND NO, this has nothing to do with our internet connection, since we are logged in to all other projects without any problems. even after a successfull logon there are extrem response delay from page to page ... |
|
19)
(Message 6753)
Posted 26 May 2020 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: +1 |
|
20)
(Message 6752)
Posted 26 May 2020 by San-Fernando-Valley Post: -1 |
Next 20